|
| In the wake of the recent
terrorism and war, some people are striving to become like the enemy and
blame the non- religious. Like terrorists, they want to rewrite history
to fit their religious agenda and make Americans repent for their liberties.
In Ringgold, Ga., a new display featuring the Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer and an empty picture frame has gone up in city hall. City Councilman Bill McMillon said the empty frame is "for those who believe in nothing." Texas Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, participated in a prayer at a middle school on Oct. 18 and then promised to promote the issue of school prayer during his next election campaign. In South Carolina, legislators are looking to change the mandatory moment of silence in schools into a "moment of silent prayer." Rep. Ernest Istook, R-Okla.,
said Americans' renewed interest in faith after Sept. 11 has encouraged
him to introduce, for a third time, the "Religious Speech Amendment."
The aim is to allow more religious expression in the classroom
The proposed text of the amendment reads: "To secure the people's right to acknowledge God according to the dictates of conscience: Neither the United States nor any State shall establish official religion, but the people's right to pray and to recognize their religious beliefs, heritage, or tradition on public property, including schools, shall not be infringed. Neither the United States nor any state shall require any person to join in prayer or other religious activity, or prescribe school prayers." And there's now a bill pending in Congress to officially declare the Irving Berlin standard, God Bless America, as the national hymn. In the most recent education bill, U.S. Congressional conferees agreed to deny all federal education dollars to local school districts that prevent or deny students from engaging in constitutionally protected school prayer. Defining what is constitutionally protected school prayer would be left to the U.S. Department of Education, according to a spokesman for the House education committee. Conferees also agreed to deny federal funds to public schools or agencies that discriminate against, or deny equal access to, any group affiliated with the Boy Scouts of America. The agreement also covers other youth groups "classified as patriotic societies under U.S. law." These are but a few examples of the push toward establishing religion while denying the act of doing so. Tim LaHay's end-times book Desecration was just released, and his video series and 8-week study program that blames the "secular humanist" conspiracy continues to be held in many churches. On top of this, the real anthrax terrorism has sparked a flood of threat-filled hoax letters being sent to over 250 abortion clinics and other feminist groups from the "Army of God," the militant anti-abortion group |
|
AAW will meet from 10:30 am to 12:30 pm ,
AAW elections will be held; the budget for next
year
Atheists and Agnostics of Wisconsin (AAW)
Visit our website at www.atheistalliance.org/aaw/ |
|
Sarah Ovenall has written the following quiz to test your ability to distinguish the rhetoric of Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and Usama bin Laden. You can take the quiz online at: funnystrange.com (or manually here). Below are 20 statements made by these individuals. See if you can identify who made each statement. Record your answers! 1. "In today's wars, there are no morals, and it is clear that mankind has descended to the lowest degrees of decadence and oppression." 2. "America is polluting the whole world." 3. "The government is com- mitted to supporting God's religion, the country remains a strong bulwark for religion, and the people are among the most protective of God's religion, and the keenest to fulfill His laws." 4. "One-world opinion is tak- ing the side of the Palestinians, not the side of Israel." 5. "There will never be world peace until God's house and God's people are given their rightful place of leadership at the top of the world." 6. "The government does not cease to cry over matters affecting religion, without making any serious effort to serve the interests of the religious community." 7. "We are on the brink of our destruction, and if we do not awaken now, it will be too late. We have been victimized by traitorous behavior on the part of our leaders." 8. "The media strives to keep the people occupied with minor matters, and to stir their emotions and desires until corruption becomes widespread among believers." 9. "There is no way that a United Nations, treaties, or any other human instrument can bring about peace. Such things mean nothing when one nation desires the land and resources of another." 10. "We have allowed ram- pant secularism.... We have insulted God at the highest levels of government." 11. "One particular report described the gaps and the shortcoming in the philosophy of the government, the situation of the law within the country and the arbitrary declaration of what is lawful and unlawful regardless of divine law as instituted by God." 12. "Priorities of spiritual work are lost while blasphemy and polytheism continue its grip and control. We should be alert to these atrocious plans carried out by the government." 13. "America is in imminent peril... rotting from within." 14. "The American people have put themselves at the mercy of a disloyal government, and this is most evident in Clinton's administration. The American government is leading the country towards hell." 15. "The termites are in charge now, and that is not the way it ought to be, and the time has arrived for a godly fumigation." 16. "If America is not suffer- ing the irrevocable judgment of God, she is dangerously close. 17. "Americans have com- mitted unprecedented stupidity. We anticipate a black future for America. 18. "If the judges appointed by man will not deal with those who take innocent human life, then God is going to enter in and bring justice. And when that happens many of the innocent will suffer along with the guilty." 19. "All these crimes and sins committed by Americans are a clear declaration of war on God." 20. "A condition like this will bring about the destruction of your nation. It'll bring about terrorist bombs; it'll bring earthquakes, tornadoes and possibly a meteor." |
|
As reported in our last issue, the Madison School Board became the center of controversy after they ruled to play an instrumental version of "The Star Spangled Banner" to comply with a new law inserted without debate into the state budget bill. The media, including the National School Board Association, characterized the decision as "banning the Pledge of Allegiance," though the board had actually only opted for a neutral solution to the mandate. The school board voted to reverse their decision after receiving thousands of complaints and an open public forum on Oct. 16 that lasted over nine hours. Some AAW members attended the forum Every speaker was allotted three minutes. About one-third supported the board, while two- thirds opposed the original decision. AAW members Laura Brown, Dennis Coyier and Jim Dew spoke. Laura's comments were picked up and circulated by the national media. What follows is Laura's husband (and AAW's secretary) Mark Shahan's comments. <><><><><><><><><> My first experience with controversy over the Pledge of Allegiance occurred when I was a 6th grader in small-town Iowa. One girl in my class refused to stand and recite the pledge with the class because she was a Jehovah's Witness. At one recess, my best friend viciously harassed this girl, repeatedly calling her "a commie." At the time, I did not know how to respond so I did not respond at all. Now I will. The crux of this debate, it seems to me is what does it mean to be "patriotic?" Are saying the Pledge or singing the Star Spangled Banner the only ways we can express patriotism? I could just as easily make a case that people who don't vote and don't inform themselves so they can vote, are unpatriotic. Why not recite the preamble to the Constitution, the Gettysburg Address, or the First Amendment to the Constitution? My suspicion is that what it means to be patriotic is as varied as there are people in this room and, if given a chance, the different ways of expressing patriotism are just as varied. But instead of building on this variety, the State Legislature has seen fit to restrict it by deeming appropriate only two ways for public school children each day to express their patriotism. This was done deliberately to be divisive, to create a wedge of allegiance with which to smear as unpatriotic or un-American political opponents who might object. It is ironic that the State Legislators pushing this are the same ones pushing local control on other issues and complaining about one size fits all. This is a two size fits all solution usurping the most local of control -- that of one's conscience. But why should some expressions of patriotism be promoted or endorsed but not others? If this debate is about freedom of expression, why is only the majority's expression the only one acceptable. Furthermore, what makes such expressions meaningful is that it is freely given without coercion. When such expressions become mundane rituals, they loose some of their meaning precisely because they loose their spontaneity. And when subtly or overtly coerced on others, such expressions not only do not engender patriotism they breed resentment and hostility. So what should the Madison School District's policy be? It should be a policy grounded on freedom of expression by the STUDENTS. There are two ways this can be done. The first way is the policy the School Board enacted at last Monday's meeting and that has been misinterpreted as "a ban on the pledge." This policy allows students to practice what beliefs they choose but keeps school officials from dictating those expressions. This is similar to how individual religious expressions are currently handled nation wide in public schools. The second way to do this is more expression, not less. There would still be a time set aside for patriotism but one day it might be the Pledge; another day it might be a students poem; on yet another it might be a reading of the First Amendment to the Constitution. Some might say this violates the current State law that started this furor. But it does not have to if each class agrees to let each student take a turn leading the moment of patriotism. This is the same compromise that was made on the Dane County Board of Supervisors. This allows all views to be expressed -- majority and minority. It allows students to learn more about one another and, if guided by a teacher, to learn about the rights and responsibilities of citizens in a democracy. In short, more expression leads to education insuring that this expression of patriotism is not all form and no substance. |

|
Jabez Revealed! Three best selling books have been inspired by Jabez (JAY- bez), a Biblical character whose life entails a 48-word passage from First Chronicles in the Old Testament. "His mother had named him Jabez, saying, ‘I gave birth to him in pain.'" The movement, begun by evangelist Bruce Wilkinson, has led to Jabez backpacks, Christmas ornaments, candles, mouse pads, a purple bear, coffee mugs, bath gels, neckties, and even a framed artist¹s conception of Jabez himself. A proposal for Jabez candy bars was rejected. "We want to be careful about not overcommercializing this," said Leslie Nunn Reed, the licensing agent. Curious about this, I did an image search for "Jabez." Below is a photo, Jabez.jpg, I found: ![]() |
| AAW Homepage | More Reasonings | Contact an Atheist |