Annual Board Meeting
Democracy is a fractious and often messy process, and the Atheist Alliance's
board meeting this year most assuredly demonstrated that. It is also, though,
a wondrous thing, allowing the very best solutions to be found, and it was this
that the Alliance's board meeting demonstrated to perfection. Guests are welcome
to visit and see exactly what happens; we have no secrets.
|
Richard Russell, Our Parliamentarian, With His Atheist Flag.
Richard says that the zero stands for the number of gods, and the infinity
symbol he leaves to atheists to debate.
|
|
First, a small number of us who were interested in dealing with the matching funds issue
met beforehand to hammer out the details and present the result to the full board. Hammer
away we did, under the guiding hand of Richard Russell, who acted as the parliamentarian,
as he did for the full board meeting. The result was a full proposal, which was taken to
the board, with only one issue in contention, whether matching funds should be made available
to groups that had not sent a representative to the annual board meeting (and how often that
would be required, if such a rule were created). The leader of each side agreed to write and
argue the point to the board. All other issues were decided by consensus. Not bad for a
fractious, democratic process, eh?
|
|
At the full board meeting, President Marie Alena Castle granted the parliamentary
duties to Richard Russell's capable hands. He managed the meeting, allowing all
points of view to be fully aired, and calling for votes when appropriate.
During the board meeting, the Matching Grants proposal was reviewed, item by item.
Motions were made to modify sections, discussions ensued, and bit by bit, the details
were ironed out, and most changes were accepted by consensus. The issue of whether a
group would be eligible for funds unless they'd sent a representative to the board meeting
was debated long and hard, as the feelings on both sides were quite strong and sincerely
felt. In the end, the vote went for not requiring a
representative at the board meetings, thus giving smaller groups a more even
playing field.
|
|
|