Created on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 19:50
Yesterday AAI tweeted a link to an Atheist Revolution article that trivialised harassment of women in the atheist community. The tweet (and related Facebook post) have been deleted and this apology posted on the Butterflies & Wheels blog:
Hi everyone, tweeting that link was a mistake, a big one. One of our Social Media collaborators twitted the link from what looked to him as a sensible source with a title that seemed on the same page as we are. He wasn´t aware of the fact that the article is far off from our stance on harassment: we don´t condone it, we don´t defend it and we certainly will not accept it in our community, end of story. We are completely committed to promoting women feeling safer in our community (something we should all strive for) and to stopping this senseless harassment that plagues us.
We have an anti-harassment policy that is mandatory for all conventions we help organize or give funding to and we are always open to receiving suggestions or requests for help regarding this, and any other issue (email: president [at] atheistalliance [dot] org).
I personally apologize for the slip up and hope you understand we, in no way, share any view other than the fact that we all must work together against harassment in our community, we must all feel safe discussing ideas among ourselves and not blame the victims in order to hide the shortcomings our community has.
Created on Thursday, 28 March 2013 21:27
Karl from Indonesian Atheists, an AAI Affiliate, talks to the Jakarta Globe about "You Ask, An Atheist Answers":
Discussions between atheists and theists, or those who believe in the existence of God, are fragile events that rarely, though not impossibly, manage to do anything more than reinforce just how disparate the two factions’ stances are. This profound divergence is evidently true in Indonesia, where the concept of atheism is still seen as remarkably foreign, to put it mildly.
Stigmas and assumptions about Indonesian atheists often paint them as smart-aleck contrarians with a penchant for hedonistic nihilism who leave the burden of proof to believers.
To disprove this widespread view, two Indonesian atheists have taken up the call, Karl Karnadi and Virgi Albiant, the latter of which is a pseudonym used by the founder of “Anda Bertanya, Ateis Menjawab” (“You Ask, an Atheist Answers”), an Internet-based forum and community that aims to build a friendly bridge between believers and non-believers.
Read the full article here.
Created on Wednesday, 03 April 2013 10:35
Imagine living with the constant fear that an angry mob would torture you to death if they found out you are a free thinking person.
That’s how many agnostics and atheists live in Pakistan. Being Pakistani and an atheist is undoubtedly a dangerous combination. This does not even begin to make sense until you bring the context into the picture, which is a religious verdict about apostates being punishable by death. So much for 'thinking freely or differently’. This religious ruling is the prime factor that puts the life of Pakistani atheists in danger. In fact ‘thinking’ is just as big of a sin in Pakistan as thinking differently. You are doomed if you decide to use your so-called god-given mental faculties and engage in critical thinking because thinking in matters of faith is a sin in itself.
Despite the fact that revealing yourself as an atheist in Pakistan is like having a death wish, some are brave enough to publicise their atheism. Yet most atheists living in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan have no choice but to live in disguise as Muslims. They are often called ‘in-closet atheists’ which is not far from reality. The constant dread, dismay and the pressures have taken a significant mental toll on atheists in Pakistan as religion takes hold on the majority of Muslims in the country.
Another significant factor jeopardising the life of atheists living in Pakistan is the Penal code of Pakistan, which has laws decreeing the death penalty for various religious offences. This may or may not come as a surprise to free thinking people all over the world, but the famous ‘Blasphemy Law’ proposes death penalty for merely defiling the ‘sacred’ name of Holy Prophet Muhammad. So far many innocent people have fallen prey to the draconian law of blasphemy:
”An estimated number of 1,274 people have been charged under the stringent blasphemy laws of Pakistan between 1986, from when they were included in the Constitution by General Zia ul Haq, until 2010.” (Source: Dawn News)
The exhaustive list of people accused, jailed and even killed by radical Islamists ‘in the name of Allah’ can be accessed here.
Created on Friday, 19 April 2013 22:34
Pupils at Kasese Humanist Primary School numbering close to sixty participated in an event that involved planting of trees along their recently acquired permanent site on the river banks of River Nyamwamba, which borders the property in the west.
The students left from school in the evening hours of Thursday 18 April 2013 led by the School Director accompanied by the School Headteacher plus some 3 teachers. Movement to this site was by foot from the current site, along the Kasese - Fortportal highway, and they purchased a number of trees seedlings from a nearby nursery bed. We passed along the Majengo-Rukoki Trading center and headed to the School Project.
The children were so excited to learn of the news that this is going to be a future permanent home of the school. They posed for a photograph at the recently plastered building within the property. There are some plantains, bumpkins, pepper and mangoes and the kids tried their luck and took what was available.
Each child planted a tree in a hole and the trees will be looked after such that they grow and as it's rainy season now, there is a good chance they will grow. This exercise took close to two hours.
The purpose of the trees along the river bunks includes to curb soil erosion, provide shade and fresh air and to add on the beauty of the scenery. This exercise is going to continue in more weeks to come.
A fundraising campaign is in progress as the school management tries to mobilise resources to put up classroom blocks on the site and all well wishers and friends of Kasese Humanist Primary School are encouraged to support us materially, financially or morally such that we succeed in commencing bigger construction works in March 2014. If you would like to support Kasese Humanist Primary School please donate through AAI.
Created on Friday, 26 April 2013 21:35
Indonesian Atheists, an AAI Affiliate, began on Facebook in 2008 and has grown to provide a community for non-believers in Indonesia. The group was profiled in the New York Times on 26 April:
JAKARTA — Karina is an atheist, but her friends jokingly call her “the prophet.” That is because she is helping nurture a community for unbelievers in predominantly Muslim Indonesia, where trumpeting one’s disbelief in God can lead to abuse, ostracism and even prison.
“It’s very normal for atheists to be paranoid because the environment does not support them,” said Ms. Karina, 26, who uses only one name. But, she said, “in this group people don’t need to be afraid.”
For the full article click here.
Created on Monday, 29 April 2013 09:56
In their “welcome back” episode, Jake and Han discuss the sneaky politics of the Christian right, the exclusion of humanists and atheists from the post-bombing events in Boston, and the free speech protests this week. Enjoy it all here!
Created on Saturday, 11 May 2013 07:12
Our modern world, where ideas spread far
and wide with just one click, continues to fight for something as basic and
crucial as freedom of conscience. In 2013, we'd like to think otherwise, but
the truth is we have a long way to go before we can score a victory in this
The US Commission on International
Religious Freedom recognised atheist discrimination in its 2013 Annual Report. Discrimination against atheists
thrives even in a modern society such as America. In March,
the German shoe company Atheist Shoes called out the US Postal
Service for discrimination against atheists. The company found that boxes shipped to the
U.S. labelled “ATHEIST" were much more likely to be delayed or
lost en route than packaging without the label. Similarly, the talented atheist singer Shelley Segal recently faced discrimination when she was booted from a venue.
If atheists are discriminated against in
a modern country like the US, atheists face intolerable discrimination and
persecution in Muslim-majority countries. Currently in Bangladesh, Islamists
are demanding the hanging of atheists. On 25 April and 2 May atheists around the world rallied in support of the country’s atheist activists. In Afghanistan, Iran, Mauritania,
Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and the Maldives, atheists can face the death
penalty simply for expressing their views. Elsewhere atheists
face the curtailment of basic rights the right to
citizenship, prohibition from holding public
office and restricted access to public education. This year the UN Rights
Council was informed about the extensive discrimination
atheists face around the world. From Alber Saber to Alexander Aan, from Asif Mohiuddin who was stabbed by Islamists and later arrested
by the Bangladeshi government, to world-renowned Turkish pianist Fazil Say who faces retirement
after being convicted for blasphemy by his government; fromSanal Edamaruku for whom an arrest
warrant was issued by the Indian police because he debunked a miracle believed by many, to Tunisian atheists Jabeur Mejri and Ghazi Beji who were sentenced to seven years in
prison for blasphemy by a Tunisian court, there's a long list of cases of
persecution and global discrimination against atheists.
Created on Wednesday, 15 May 2013 08:32
AAI President, Carlos A. Diaz shows his support for Imad Iddine Habib.
Join us for International Imad Day! Tell the world that you, too, will face injustice!
Find more information here: http://ex-muslim.org.uk/2013/05/international-imad-day/
Created on Saturday, 18 May 2013 07:02
Links to this page in languages other than English:
Diese Seite auf Deutsch
A petition urges the UN to come to
the rescue of non-Muslims and non-believers in Pakistan – who are often the
victims of State Religion – and recognise and celebrate 11 August as the
International Day Against State Religion.
As Pakistan makes history and marks
five years of democracy by successfully upholding general elections, conditions
in Pakistan for non-Muslims and non-believers are far from getting any better.
The 2013 election has been termed the most violent election in the history of
Pakistan. The Taliban carried out their threats and attacked
convoys and rallies of secular
and even Islamist
political parties. Here is
a whole timeline of pre-poll violence in Pakistan. Even on Election Day, the violence
Non-Muslim candidates were largely absent
from the elections, but those who ran were voted for because electors felt they
could offer protection. The Christian residents of Joseph
Colony, a Christian community that was
attacked by a Muslim mob earlier this year, voted for the conservative party
Jamaat-i-Islami's non-Muslim candidate because they wanted to vote
Conditions in Pakistan for
non-Muslims are grim.
and again in 2012 the World Council Of Churches stated that minority
religious communities in Pakistan are living in “fear and terror” of
Islamic fundamentalists amid abductions and forced conversions that the
government is helpless to stop. WCC’s
ruling Central Committee declared that Pakistan’s small Hindu
and Christian communities were increasingly subject to “persecution
and discrimination”. Likewise, Ahmaddiya Muslims
outlawed and at the mercy of Islamists. In light of these and other incidents where non-Muslim and non-believer
Pakistanis have been victims of persecution and intolerance, a petition
has been set up calling on the Secretary General of the United Nations to
recognise an International Day Against State Religion on August 11, 2013 “in
solidarity with victims of the State Religion, namely, non-Muslims and
non-believers of Pakistan”. The
petition says "the life of non-Muslims and non-believers of Pakistan is as
good as hell thanks to the State Religion of Pakistan.” There is now a need for
State Religion to be hit by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Created on Monday, 01 April 2013 05:57
Image: Protesters rally at
the Philippines’ Supreme Court in Manila to protest the four-month suspension. Source: Kalatas
On Tuesday 19 March, the Philippines’ Supreme Court issued a four-month suspension
of the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act. The new law would
have required government health centres to provide free contraceptives and
schools to teach sex education.
The suspension, which is intended to allow opponents until 18 June
to present their arguments, was issued after petitions were received from
religious and pro-life groups seeking to overturn the law, who are now claiming
the move as a ‘partial
The law came
as a result of disturbing statistics in the Philippines, which revealed increased
rates of teenage pregnancies and the maternal and child death rate. The
maternal death rate alone has increased by almost 40% since 2006. These statistics have been linked to poor knowledge of
sexual health and little or no available family planning advice. The President
of the Philippines, Benigno Aquino, has thrown his support behind the law: ‘Items like sex education for
instance, how can anyone argue that there is such a need, it shouldn't be deriving
your knowledge from your peer group who are actually as ignorant as you.’ The
President’s office reported that despite the suspension, there is confidence
that the law will be retained.
Even if it
is retained, opposition to the law will likely remain. 80% of the Philippines’ population
of 100 million identify as Catholic and as yet the Catholic Church in the
Philippines and elsewhere has vociferously opposed any reproductive health law.
There is hope, however. On the day the suspension was announced, protesters
gathered at the Philippines’ Supreme Court in Manila, claiming that the Supreme
Court should be held “accountable to the 15 women and
children who will die each day” until the law is reinstated.
Created on Wednesday, 10 April 2013 09:17
by Nathan Lean is making the rounds on the internet and it seems like everybody
is jumping on the atheist-bashing bandwagon. Lean recently wrote an article for Salon – the title: Dawkins,
Harris, Hitchens: New Atheists flirt with Islamophobia. Many anti-Islamophobia crusaders quickly shared it
with comments like “Dawkins’ idiot brigade”. To be fair, many liberals,
atheists and Christians shared it too. But Lean’s article is currently a hot
favourite in circles that dislike atheists in general because of their atheist
read Lean’s article, you probably already know who he is. But if you
haven’t, let me fill you in. Nathan Lean
is the editor-in-chief of the non-profit organisation Aslan Media, an aggressive pro-Islamic, self-proclaimed opponent of Israel of which
some members – including Lean himself – hold a reputation for making
anti-Israel comments on Twitter. Aslan
Media is supposedly an anti-Islamophobia crusader, taking cheap shots at
Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller in the past, and been called out by Jihad
Watch on more than one occasion. It is also ‘supported’ by Loonwatch, a group of
anonymous people who smear almost every critic of Islam while also outing
anti-Muslim bigots. Lean is also
the author of the book The Islamophobia Industry, which received a critical review by Jonathan Schanzer for the Wall Street Journal, and elicited a petulant and
defensive response piece viciously attacking Schanzer by Loonwatch. As well as writing books, Lean also endorses cyber
of 'new atheism' is that this type of non-believer is the 'mean' and
‘in-your-face’. Lean puts new atheists like Harris, Dawkins and
Hitchens in the ranks of Pamela Geller and anti-Muslim bigots, calling new atheists ‘the new Islamophobes’. This is a little disturbing and so over the
top that it sounds almost absurd. Anyone who has read the works of 'new atheists' such as Dawkins and Harris knows that their ‘invectives’ are directed
against Islam as a religion, and not Muslims. If Lean should be criticising
anyone, it should be those who engage in destructive acts of terror, those who
make the lives of people hell on earth by giving fatwas, those Muslims
who kill Muslims and then go on to whine about Islamophobia.
Created on Thursday, 25 April 2013 23:39
Created on Saturday, 27 April 2013 21:51
In the wake of the bombing at the Boston Marathon, many Americans focus on *why* it happened. It seems to be human nature to try to find the cause behind these types of events and, when any information is found, then attempt to use that knowledge to prevent any future incidents from taking place. Unfortunately, more often than not the “Why?” question leads down a path to an emotional response and bigotry rather than rational solutions.
This line of thinking can also be dangerous and may infringe on the rights of those who are in no way connected to the event. In this case, the first news to come from an official source said the act was religion based, and that the bombers identified their religion as Islam. Before this news even came to light, the right-wing extremists had been calling the attack "a pretty safe bet .. that this attack was carried out by an Islamist.” This sparked outcries from many left-leaning liberals of “Islamophobia” and racism, some justifiably so. However, the two groups caught up in these remarks from both sides are peaceful Muslims who want to distance themselves from this violence, and anyone who speaks out against Islam in a more civil, factual tone. Look at some of the writings of Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins and at the responses they have received. Simple statements or questions, based on facts such as Islamic traditions teaching that the Prophet Mohammed flew on a winged horse, have elicited the “Islamophobe” response. This exaggerated, ill-used retort does nothing to counter any logical statements, but only serves as an attempt at discrediting an otherwise valid, logical point. Meanwhile, moderate Muslims are caught in a wave of ridicule and hyperbole from right-wing fundamentalists.
Created on Wednesday, 01 May 2013 21:30
2013, the Zambian government asked the church to help fight what it called
‘vices’, the most notable of these being homosexuality. It has been
reported that over Easter some rather brave gay couples tried to get married
and have their unions officially recognised. This was enough to scare the
government into action and following their request for help, a Zambia Police spokesperson promised to crack
down on "homosexual activities". A gay rights activist, Paul
Kasonkomona, was arrested days
reasons given for the need to rid society of homosexuality are nothing new:
it’s not a part of Zambian culture, it’s unAfrican, it’s unChristian and it
goes against Biblical law. On the one hand, opponents of gay rights are arguing
that because homosexuality is alien to Zambia (it isn't), it should not be allowed and they use
Christianity to back up their views. What these hypocrites don't acknowledge is
that Christianity is unAfrican. It is a religion that was introduced to Africa
by European colonialists and wholeheartedly embraced. Those who oppose gay
rights in Zambia and throughout Africa falsely claim homosexuality as foreign
to the continent, yet they use a foreign religion to back up their claims.
with homosexuality, the
Zambian government has shown a complete disregard for separation of church and
state. Government officials not only use their Christian faith to guide their
work but actively involve the church in it. This is unfair for the
non-Christians and people with no religious affiliation living in Zambia as
they are forced to live under rules based on a religion they do not subscribe
to. Laws developed through logical thinking, taking into consideration issues
facing the modern world and human rights do better to serve the people than
laws based on ancient texts whose true authors are unknown. These texts, in
form of the so-called Holy Bible, contain a multitude of passages that are not
at all acceptable in the modern world and yet they are held in such high esteem
by a large proportion of the population, including those who make decisions
that affect everyone living in Zambia.
Created on Saturday, 11 May 2013 21:38
Jake and Han interview Sanderson Jones of the new Atheist Church in London. Listen and enjoy!
Created on Thursday, 16 May 2013 10:15
Iran is one of seven nations
(Afghanistan, Maldives, Mauritania, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Sudan being the
other six) where apostasy is legally punishable by death. A stronger incentive not to be counted as
infidel is probably harder to come by. And yet, to date, 3,468 atheists in Iran
have gone to atheistcensus.com to do just that.
To be part of society in Iran,
religious affiliation – Muslim or otherwise - is required: for official forms,
for social inclusion, for just appearing “normal”. Despite the religious appearance, Iran is one
of the top 10 contributors to the Atheist Census, suggesting that atheists do
indeed exist there. It’s just that they
In this context, it was heartening and
harrowing to receive an unsolicited email from an Iranian woman who warmly
thanked the creators of Atheist Census for giving her a forum to be counted. It was notable that she identified herself as
atheist, an Iranian and a global citizen.
She was appreciative, but was not
satisfied with counting herself anonymously. She mentioned that she was going to tell her
“numerous” non-religious friends about the site.
According to the latest statistics on
Atheist Census, 88% of Iranians who took the short, six question survey, were
raised Muslim. They have now rejected
their (former) faith. They are
apostates. The entomology of apostasy
comes from the Greek “apostasia” which means “revolt”. When apostasy is possibly a life and death
situation, it is not hyperbole to say that being counted as an atheist is a
revolutionary act. Perhaps it is even
more so when a woman professes herself as infidel, given the oppression of
women in particular in Islamic countries. This atheist, this Iranian, indeed this global
citizen who was counted in Atheist Census and then took the time to send me an
email, was one woman among the (only) 20% of Iranians who have been counted in
Atheist Census that identify as female.
Often surveys are important to those who
have created them. This short story
shows that some surveys can also be important to those who participate in them.
Created on Thursday, 23 May 2013 21:41
Wednesday, Pope Francis addressed people from all walks of life by claiming
that anyone who does ‘good’ will go to heaven, even atheists. Pope Francis has
been the first in many aspects of his papacy: first Pope from the Americas,
first Jesuit Pope, and first to use Francis as a regnal name. However, he is
not among the first to take a more universalist approach. Pope John XXIII began
the Second Vatican Council in 1962, stating he wanted to “throw open the
windows of the Church so that we can see out and the people can see in.” That
council went on to be more accepting of others, but their acceptance focused
primarily on other types of Christ-based religions. Many Christians, from
Origen in the third century to Madeleine L’Engle in the twenty first century,
have argued for a universal acceptance to heaven, but never has a Pope so
concretely stated that morality, not faith, is the way to heaven. With such a
broad change from the denominationally strict tendencies of his predecessor,
Pope Benedict XVI, what does Pope Francis’ Wednesday morning mass mean for
Francis alluded to the Gospel of Mark during his mass, telling a story of
Jesus’ disciples seeing another man do good and complaining that “if he is not
one of us, he cannot do good. If he is not our party, he cannot do good.” The
Pope explained that Jesus tells his disciples not to “hinder him” and they
should “let him do good.” It appears that the Pope is paralleling the story
found on Mark 9:39-40. This book was likely the first of the four canonical
gospels, having been written around 60 C.E. It provides the early groundwork
for what modern Christians believe, such as being the only gospel to refer to
Jesus as a carpenter. With such significance, shouldn’t Mark’s universalist
undertones have come to light sooner? Additionally, Mark isn’t the only one
arguing for acceptance: “Do not hinder him; for he who is not against you is
for you” (Luke 9:50). With all of these apparent allusions, why is Pope Francis
the first to openly accept all people? There is a simple answer: the Bible is