|
"Radical criticism
does not start from the belief that the non plus ultra of critical
emancipation has been realized by the Tübingen school; but
neither does it think that that school went too far. For it, there
is nothing a priori 'too far' in this field; and it believes that
criticism is ever duty bound to criticize its own work and repair
its own defects. It recognizes no theoretical limit whatsoever that
can reasonably be fixed... It wishes nothing better than, mutatis
mutandis, to continue the research pursued by the Tübingen
school, and, standing on the shoulders of Baur and others, and thus
presumably with the prospect of seeing clearer and farther, to advance
another stage, as long a stage as possible, towards a real knowledge
of Christian history." |