From the Editor
|
30 June 2011
“It
is sad. One half of the world does not believe in God, and the other half does
not believe in me.” Oscar Wilde
Mea Culpa. I’ve been scorched and taken to task for a mistake of omission and another of perception. Let me explain.
At the World
Atheist Convention, I sat on the panel “Communicating Atheism” and presented my
view on how we can communicate atheism by advancing it, and I used a good
cop/bad cop analogy. Unfortunately, I used technology to keep track of my
notes, and for this ink and paper guy that turned out to be a jump head of
disaster. My point was that in order to communicate and advance atheism, we as
atheists have to offer an alternative to the religious, an alternative to the
strident, in-your-face atheists who have made the atheist strides we’ve had so
far, an alternative that will invite the religious to sit down and discuss our
world view. This other group of atheists, mind you, are not humanists, freethinkers,
rationalists or whatever other “nicer” — perhaps apologetic — name you want to
use to downplay atheism, to sanitize atheism to the religious. No, the other
group would be atheists in full name, and not apologists for atheism either.
Just as strident, just as stern, just as demanding for our rights — just less
vocal.


